PI-RADS Prostate Imaging–Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2

Articles citing PI-RADS Prostate Imaging–Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2

Title / Author	Year
MRI-targeted or standard biopsy for prostate-cancer diagnosis V Kasivisvanathan, AS Rannikko, M Borghi, V Panebianco, LA Mynderse, ... New England Journal of Medicine 378 (19), 1767-1777	2018
The diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer: a review MS Litwin, HJ Tan Jama 317 (24), 2532-2542	2017
Prostate magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy in patients with a prior negative biopsy: a consensus statement by AUA and SAR AB Rosenkrantz, S Verma, P Choyke, SC Eberhardt, SE Eggener, ... The Journal of urology 196 (6), 1613-1618	2016
What is the negative predictive value of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in excluding prostate cancer at biopsy? A systematic review and meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology Prostate Cancer Guidelines Panel PC Moldovan, T Van den Broeck, R Sylvester, L Marconi, J Bellmunt, ... European urology 72 (2), 250-266	2017
Use of prostate systematic and targeted biopsy on the basis of multiparametric MRI in biopsy-naive patients (MRI-FIRST): a prospective, multicentre, paired diagnostic study O Rouvière, P Puech, R Renard-Penna, M Claudon, C Roy, ... The Lancet Oncology 20 (1), 100-109	2019
Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2.1: 2019 update of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 B Turkbey, AB Rosenkrantz, MA Haider, AR Padhani, G Villeirs, ... European urology 76 (3), 340-351	2019
Head-to-head comparison of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy versus multiparametric prostate resonance imaging with subsequent magnetic resonance-guided biopsy in biopsy-naïve men with elevated prostate-specific antigen: a large prospective multicenter clinical study M van der Leest, E Cornel, B Israel, R Hendriks, AR Padhani, ... European urology 75 (4), 570-578	2019
Diagnostic performance of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 for detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis S Woo, CH Suh, SY Kim, JY Cho, SH Kim European urology 72 (2), 177-188	2017
68 Ga-PSMA ligand PET/CT in patients with prostate cancer: How we review and report I Rauscher, T Maurer, WP Fendler, WH Sommer, M Schwaiger, M Eiber Cancer Imaging 16 (1), 14	2016
Diagnostic pathway with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging versus standard pathway: results from a randomized prospective study in biopsy-naive patients with suspected prostate cancer F Porpiglia, M Manfredi, F Mele, M Cossu, E Bollito, A Veltri, S Cirillo, ... European urology 72 (2), 282-288	2017
Accuracy and agreement of PIRADSv2 for prostate cancer mpMRI: a multireader study MD Greer, AM Brown, JH Shih, RM Summers, J Marko, YM Law, ... Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 45 (2), 579-585	2017
Abbreviated biparametric prostate MR imaging in men with elevated prostate-specific antigen CK Kuhl, R Bruhn, N Krämer, S Nebelung, A Heidenreich, S Schrading Radiology 285 (2), 493-505	2017
Proposed adjustments to PI-RADS version 2 decision rules: impact on prostate cancer detection AB Rosenkrantz, JS Babb, SS Taneja, JM Ream Radiology 283 (1), 119-129	2017
Reporting magnetic resonance imaging in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer: the PRECISE recommendations—a report of a European School of Oncology Task Force CM Moore, F Giganti, P Albertsen, C Allen, C Bangma, A Briganti, ... European urology 71 (4), 648-655	2017
Optimising the diagnosis of prostate cancer in the era of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: a cost-effectiveness analysis based on the Prostate MR Imaging Study (PROMIS) R Faria, MO Soares, E Spackman, HU Ahmed, LC Brown, R Kaplan, ... European urology 73 (1), 23-30	2018
Magnetic resonance imaging underestimation of prostate cancer geometry: use of patient specific molds to correlate images with whole mount pathology A Priester, S Natarajan, P Khoshnoodi, DJ Margolis, SS Raman, ... The Journal of urology 197 (2), 320-326	2017
Machine learning-based analysis of MR radiomics can help to improve the diagnostic performance of PI-RADS v2 in clinically relevant prostate cancer J Wang, CJ Wu, ML Bao, J Zhang, XN Wang, YD Zhang European Radiology 27 (10), 4082-4090	2017
The value of PSA density in combination with PI-RADS™ for the accuracy of prostate cancer prediction FA Distler, JP Radtke, D Bonekamp, C Kesch, HP Schlemmer, ... The Journal of urology 198 (3), 575-582	2017
Prostate imaging-reporting and data system steering committee: PI-RADS v2 status update and future directions AR Padhani, J Weinreb, AB Rosenkrantz, G Villeirs, B Turkbey, J Barentsz European urology 75 (3), 385-396	2019
Multicentre evaluation of targeted and systematic biopsies using magnetic resonance and ultrasound image‐fusion guided transperineal prostate biopsy in patients with a previous negative biopsy NL Hansen, C Kesch, T Barrett, B Koo, JP Radtke, D Bonekamp, ... BJU international 120 (5), 631-638	2017

1 - 20

Dates and citation counts are estimated and are determined automatically by a computer program.