| Practice Makes Perfect-an Empirical Study of Claim Construction Reversal Rates in Patent Cases DL Schwartz Mich. L. Rev. 107, 223, 2008 | 293 | 2008 |
| Understanding the realities of modern patent litigation JR Allison, MA Lemley, DL Schwartz Tex. L. Rev. 92, 1769, 2013 | 240 | 2013 |
| Analyzing the role of non-practicing entities in the patent system DL Schwartz, JP Kesan Cornell L. Rev. 99, 425, 2013 | 218 | 2013 |
| Unpacking patent assertion entities (PAEs) CA Cotropia, JP Kesan, DL Schwartz Minn. L. Rev. 99, 649, 2014 | 191 | 2014 |
| The Rise of Contingent Fee Representation in Patent Litigation D Schwartz Alabama L. Rev., 2012 | 135 | 2012 |
| Our divided patent system JR Allison, MA Lemley, DL Schwartz U. Chi. L. Rev. 82, 1073, 2015 | 113 | 2015 |
| The use of legal scholarship by the Federal Courts of Appeals: an empirical study DL Schwartz, L Petherbridge Cornell L. Rev. 96, 1345, 2010 | 91 | 2010 |
| Courting Specialization: An Empirical Study of Claim Construction Comparing Patent Litigation Before Federal District Courts and the International Trade Commission DL Schwartz Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 50, 1699, 2008 | 91 | 2008 |
| Standards of Proof in Civil Litigation: An Experiment from Patent Law D Schwartz, C Seaman Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, Forthcoming, 2012 | 75 | 2012 |
| Explaining the Demise of the Doctrine of Equivalents DL Schwartz Berkeley Tech. LJ 26, 1157, 2011 | 70 | 2011 |
| An Empirical Assessment of the Supreme Court's Use of Legal Scholarship L Petherbridge, DL Schwartz Nw. UL Rev. 106, 995, 2012 | 68* | 2012 |
| Pre-Markman Reversal Rates DL Schwartz Loy. LAL Rev. 43, 1073, 2009 | 67 | 2009 |
| How often do non-practicing entities win patent suits? JR Allison, MA Lemley, DL Schwartz Berkeley Technology Law Journal 32 (1), 237-310, 2017 | 65 | 2017 |
| On mass patent aggregators DL Schwartz Colum. L. Rev. Sidebar 114, 51, 2014 | 32 | 2014 |
| Retroactivity at the Federal Circuit DL Schwartz Ind. LJ 89, 1547, 2014 | 23 | 2014 |
| Heterogeneity Among Patent Plaintiffs: An Empirical Analysis of Patent Case Progression, Settlement, and Adjudication CA Cotropia, JP Kesan, DL Schwartz Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 15 (1), 80-125, 2018 | 22 | 2018 |
| The hidden value of abandoned applications to the patent system CA Cotropia, DL Schwartz BCL Rev. 61, 2809, 2020 | 21 | 2020 |
| Patently Risky: Framing, Innovation, and Entrepreneurial Preferences E Hoffman, DL Schwartz, M Spitzer, E Talley Harv. JL & Tech. 34, 191, 2020 | 16 | 2020 |
| Understanding patent “privateering”: A quantitative assessment JP Kesan, A Layne‐Farrar, DL Schwartz Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 16 (2), 343-380, 2019 | 15 | 2019 |
| " Inventorless" Inventions? The Constitutional Conundrum of AI-Produced Inventions DL Schwartz, M Rogers Harv. JL & Tech. 35, 531, 2021 | 14 | 2021 |
Christopher CotropiaDennis I. Belcher Professor of Law, University of Richmond Law SchoolVerified email at richmond.edu
