Follow
Danica M. Ommen
Danica M. Ommen
Verified email at iastate.edu
Title
Cited by
Cited by
Year
Building a unified statistical framework for the forensic identification of source problems
DM Ommen, CP Saunders
Law, Probability and Risk 17 (2), 179-197, 2018
462018
An argument against presenting interval quantifications as a surrogate for the value of evidence
DM Ommen, CP Saunders, C Neumann
Science & Justice 56 (5), 383-387, 2016
302016
The characterization of Monte Carlo errors for the quantification of the value of forensic evidence
DM Ommen, CP Saunders, C Neumann
Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 87 (8), 1608-1643, 2017
262017
A problem in forensic science highlighting the differences between the Bayes factor and likelihood ratio
DM Ommen, CP Saunders
Statistical Science 36 (3), 344-359, 2021
192021
Score-based likelihood ratios to evaluate forensic pattern evidence
N Garton, D Ommen, J Niemi, A Carriquiry
arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.09470, 2020
122020
Approximate statistical solutions to the forensic identification of source problem
DM Ommen
South Dakota State University, 2017
102017
Handwriting identification using random forests and score‐based likelihood ratios
MQ Johnson, DM Ommen
Statistical Analysis and Data Mining: The ASA Data Science Journal 15 (3 …, 2022
92022
Advances toward validating examiner writership opinion based on handwriting kinematics
DM Ommen, C Fuglsby, MP Caligiuri
Forensic Science International 318, 110644, 2021
92021
Characterization and differentiation of aluminum powders used in improvised explosive devices–Part 1: Proof of concept of the utility of particle micromorphometry
JM Baldaino, DM Ommen, CP Saunders, J Hietpas, JA Buscaglia
Journal of forensic sciences 66 (1), 83-95, 2021
62021
Characterization and differentiation of aluminum powders used in improvised explosive devices. Part 2: Micromorphometric method refinement and preliminary statistical analysis
DM Ommen, JM Baldaino, CP Saunders, J Hietpas, JA Buscaglia
Journal of forensic sciences 67 (2), 505-515, 2022
52022
Use of an Automated System to Evaluate Feature Dissimilarities in Handwriting Under a Two‐Stage Evaluative Process*,
C Fuglsby, C Saunders, DM Ommen, MP Caligiuri
Journal of Forensic Sciences 65 (6), 2080-2086, 2020
52020
Source‐anchored, trace‐anchored, and general match score‐based likelihood ratios for camera device identification
S Reinders, Y Guan, D Ommen, J Newman
Journal of Forensic Sciences 67 (3), 975-988, 2022
42022
Elucidating the relationships between two automated handwriting feature quantification systems for multiple pairwise comparisons
C Fuglsby, C Saunders, DM Ommen, JA Buscaglia, MP Caligiuri
Journal of Forensic Sciences 67 (2), 642-650, 2022
42022
Reconciling the Bayes Factor and Likelihood Ratio for Two Non-Nested Model Selection Problems
DM Ommen, CP Saunders
arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.09798, 2019
42019
Generalized fiducial factor: An alternative to the Bayes factor for forensic identification of source problems
JP Williams, DM Ommen, J Hannig
The Annals of Applied Statistics 17 (1), 378-402, 2023
32023
A Note on the specific source identification problem in forensic science in the presence of uncertainty about the background population
DM Ommen, CP Saunders, C Neumann
arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.08234, 2015
32015
Ensemble learning for score likelihood ratios under the common source problem
F Veneri, DM Ommen
Statistical Analysis and Data Mining: The ASA Data Science Journal 16 (6 …, 2023
22023
A statistical approach to aid examiners in the forensic analysis of handwriting
AM Crawford, DM Ommen, AL Carriquiry
Journal of Forensic Sciences 68 (5), 1768-1779, 2023
22023
A rotation-based feature and Bayesian hierarchical model for the forensic evaluation of handwriting evidence in a closed set
AM Crawford, DM Ommen, AL Carriquiry
The Annals of Applied Statistics 17 (2), 1127-1151, 2023
22023
An evaluation of score-based likelihood ratios for glass data
F Veneri, D Ommen
22021
The system can't perform the operation now. Try again later.
Articles 1–20